The big summit between Donald
Trump and Kim Jong-un ended on a sizzler. We are not surprised at all, because
a few days ago Laibach chief ideologist Ivan Novak told us that nobody really
wanted to come to an agreement about North Korea. He knows, because in 2015
Laibach could perform with in the most isolated country in the world, a big stunt
for the band that has devoted themselves for almost 40 years to the study of
totalitarianism. In North Korea, Laibach played songs from 'The Sound Of
Music', which they now release as a new CD.
‘The Sound Of Music’ is perhaps the most
kitschy work you have ever done, with children choirs and sentimental
keyboards, and of course the songs from a commercial musical from the sixties.
Aren’t you afraid to lose the traditional industrial fans of Laibach?
No, not as
long as they are true fans. True fans do not question, they follow. And
regarding the industrial aspect -
this album was created more ‘industrially’ than any other album that we did
before. Total industrial process, pure industry! Anyhow - we
don’t need anyone whom we cannot keep.
‘The Sound Of Music’ goes back to your concerts
in North Korea, where you played in 2015. In ‘Liberation Day’ – the documentary
about your trip to North Korea – I was surprised to hear you say that you
wondered if we should take the dictatorship out of it’s isolation, since people
appeared to be happy, compared to the rest of the world. Since when is Laibach
concerned with the happiness of people?
Of course
we are concerned about happiness; it is one of the most totalitarian concepts of
the perfect, liberated world - on both sides of the hemisphere.
The CD version of ‘The Sound Of Music’ also
includes ‘Arirang’, a traditional Korean song that you performed in Pyongyang.
There is no mention of the other two Korean songs that you adapted to Laibach
‘new originals’ and which you could not perform due to
censorship: ‘Honorable Live And Death’ en ‘We'll Go To Mt. Paektu’. Why
were they not included on the CD?
We couldn’t
put everything on the album and didn’t find it necessary to include these two songs,
as ‘We'll Go To Mt. Paektu’ was already released
digitally, and ‘Honourable Live And Death’ will be released separately in the near
future, for another special occasion, related to our visit of North Korea.
You dedicate ‘The Sound Of Music’ to the people
of North Korea and Austria. The illustrations in the CD booklet indeed show
mountains and landscapes that could belong in both countries. Are there more
comparisons between both countries?
Yes, there
are plenty of comparisons between both countries and The Sound of Music tells
it all.
Laibach is legendary for the role you played in
ex-Yugoslavia, which was also a communist dictatorship. Of course a band like
Laibach would not be possible in North Korea. What would you conclude when you
compare communism in North Korea and communism in Yugoslavia?
Well, after
all Laibach WAS possible in North Korea, otherwise we’d never performed there. But
communism in Yugoslavia was quite different from the North Korean one, although
Tito and Kim Ill Sung were good friends and visited each other in the sixties. Communism
in Yugoslavia was destroyed because there was too much freedom around, with an
overdose of black humour that finally killed it, as it was practiced and
understood too literary.
Let’s go back to your former release: ‘Also
sprach Zarathustra’. Laibach is a band that has based its work on the research
of the link between ideology and art. I was surprised that you did not exploit
the goldmine of controversial statements that this magnum opus by the German
philosopher Nietzsche represents to a greater extend. Why was that?
But, we did
it, and not only with ‘Also sprach Zarathustra’. You can find Nietzsche all
over our work, although we are in principle not Nietzscheans, we consider ourselves Duchampians.
Let’s go even further back in time. Laibach has
a tradition in apocalyptic predictions. On the fantastic ‘Spectre’ from 2014,
we can hear: ‘Europe is falling apart!’ This innuendo very much seems to become
reality. The United Kingdom is leaving the EU, while nationalist movements are
on the rise in almost every other country. What do you think about these
developments?
It looks
like we will have to stop predicting things, because our predictions turn into
reality very fast. Europe
is in fact constantly falling apart but it seems that falling apart is Europe’s
specific way of constituting itself. Every time it tries to re-establish itself,
it fails better. But there probably is no other alternative for European
countries anyway than a strong European Union.
What Europe
needs most of all is a real revolution. The true utopia is that goals of social
justice, financial stability and environmental sustainability can be achieved
within the parameters of the global capitalist system. The real causes of the
people’s misery, after all, are not caused by the corruption of a few hundred
politicians or the greed of a few thousand bankers, but in the structural
dynamics that enable and reward such behavior in the first place.
Today’s
crisis cannot be solved by regulation — or ‘cosmetic surgery’ of any kind. It
can only be solved by transformation into a different system altogether. A United
Europe can be saved, not as the cold Europe of the Brussels political
technocracy and banking sectors, operating according to the dictates of
neoliberal dogma, but as a re-politicized Europe, founded on a shared
emancipatory project.
The European
Union must find the right balance between debate and consensus on an overall
vision. That vision must permeate into all aspects of society. Without this
vision Europe cannot progress. Diverse nationalist movements
and the right wing expansion in the EU are on the rise exactly because of the lack of common social and political
vision and because the prevalent political model in Europe is basically
neoliberalism with a right wing management.
The majority of the nationalist
politicians, who were elected in the EU parliament, are actually afraid to lose
their well-paid jobs and positions, so their anti-European stances are most of
the time merely a strategic pose for their frustrated national voters. Brexit
is the extreme paradox of this situation. Of course Europe without Britain is
not what it should and could be, but in a way Great Britain never really wanted
to be a part of EU. Britain wanted Europe to be part of Great Britain, except on
safe distance, as a tourist destination and a healthy market for British economical
and cultural expansion.
The international situation involving North Korea has changed very much since your shows there in 2015. It was then an international pariah due to tests with nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, but has now entered peace-talks with South Korea and the United States. This détente is fragile, of course, as love declaration still can change to brutal statements and warnings. What do you think? How do you solve a problem like Korea?
You don’t
solve it, especially not with Trump. In reality, nobody really wants to solve a
Korean problem. The current North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un and the South Korean president Moon Jae-in are actually developing a very
healthy process that is opening possibilities for reunification of both Koreas
into one country. The basic problem
is that Americans do not want to close their military bases in South Korea and
this will be the biggest obstacle for the reunification.
Americans are not interested in North
Korea. They are interested in China and they want to keep an eye over the East
China Sea. They are surrounding China with something like 40 military bases and
their base in South Korea is among the most important ones. The troublemaking
North Korean regime is just a perfect excuse in the whole equation, but not the
real target.
On the other hand China will not allow the
reunification of Koreas for as long as US troupes will stay in South Korea.
That is why North Korea as a country and its people are basically just a
collateral damage of this power game between China and United States, and that
is why White House does not want to sign a final peace treaty with North Korea
already since 1953. On top of that Japan
is not very happy with the idea of united and economically strong Korea.
China is not very enthusiastic about it
either, and the majority of South Korean politicians are opposing the re-unification
because of the high costs that South Korea would have to pay into this project
and on the other hand the military and political elite of North Korea also do
not want to lose their privileged positions and even less their heads if such
unification would really happen.
Therefore all the talks that are going on between North Koreans and Americans
are merely just a spectacle, showing Trump’s good will and his ‘presidential
wisdom’. Unless Kim Jong-un and his
sister are hiding another strong joker in their pockets, there is not much hope
that something will really change for the North Korean people.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten